Seven Big-Thinking Proposals For Dealing With Nuclear Waste

Nuclear energy is looking like it will be a big part of a fossil-fuel-free future in the U.S. But the big question remains as big as ever: What’s to be done with the waste it generates?

In our Future of the Environment issue, we mentioned one visionary’s suggestions: self-sinking tungsten spheres that stash spent nuclear fuel deep beneath the Earth’s surface. That idea is a long way from reality, but in our green-energy-starved present, it may be worth considering all options, no matter how wacky.

Nuclear reactors create high-level nuclear waste, composed of spent fuel rods loaded with the still-radioactive isotopes created when uranium-235 fissions. Some of those isotopes, like cesium-137 and strontium-90, have half-lives of 30 years or so — but high-level waste also includes plutonium-239, which has a half-life of 24,000 years. Thanks to the fission process, fuel rods are actually more radioactive when they come out of the reactor than when they go in. But at the moment, using the spent rods as a source of fuel just isn’t cost effective. And 24,000-year storage solutions are hard to come by, it turns out.

Additional reporting by John Bradley

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!