DARPA Wants Long-Lasting Super-Precise Portable Atomic Clocks
Kelsey D. Atherton
at 09:42 AM Aug 29 2016
Atomic Frequency Standard NIST-7
National Institute of Standards and Technology, via Wikimedia Commons
Tech // 

Seconds can make the difference between life and death on the battlefield. That's why DARPA, the Pentagon's future projects wing, wants better, portable atomic clocks, small enough to go into battery-powered devices. While GPS receivers can pick up the precise time from the satellites, when the signal is weak or absent, a local clock on the device can supplement the navigation, providing continuity. For troops navigating by GPS, better clocks on their GPS receivers means they go where they're supposed to.

Current atomic clocks are relatively expensive, and come with large size, weight, and power (SWaP) demands. From DARPA's description of the project:

Existing battery-powered timing sources limit the mission application space of electronic systems due to power-on frequency changes (“retrace”) and due to longterm frequency drift and frequency sensitivity to temperature (“tempco”). Today, the best battery-powered clocks, developed under the DARPA Chip-Scale Atomic Clock (CSAC) program, provide 100X superior performance to mechanical oscillators of comparable SWaP. Nonetheless, they require 6-12 hours of calibration after turn-on, due to retrace error, and support limited mission durations of 3-6 hours, due to tempco and drift.

To get better atomic clocks to troops, DARPA wants to take advantage of recent advances in atomic physics, like laser-cooled and magneto-optically trapped atomic samples, or radio-frequency trapped ion samples.

DARPA put out the request for this clock in January. This week, it awarded the first part of the contract, between $700,000 and $775,000, to California's HRL Laboratories. The first phase of the project will take 18 months, and at the end of it, DARPA wants to see a working proof of concept. With luck, HRL labs will deliver it just on time.

comments powered by Disqus
Filed under:
Sign up for the Pop Sci newsletter
Australian Popular Science
PopSci Live