MIT Scientist Offers $100,000 to Anyone Who Can Prove Quantum Computing Is Impossible
Staff Writers
at 09:24 AM 07 Feb 2012
Comments 2
<strong>Qubits in Liquid Helium</strong>
Qubits in Liquid Helium
IMAGE BY Hulton Archive/Getty Images
Science // 

Scott Aaronson, a scientist at MIT who works mostly with theoretical quantum computers, issued a challenge to all of those deniers out there: prove that "scaleable quantum computing is impossible in the physical world," and Aaronson will personally pony up $100,000 to the winner.

Aaronson works with quantum computing theory all day; sounds like he's sick of the constant chatter that quantum computing is not scaleable, that the theory is purely theoretical. (Check out our interview with Seth Lloyd for a great beginner's guide to quantum computing.) There are as many skeptics as believers out there, so Aaronson is asking them to step up and prove that quantum computers will never be able to do useful work.

"Useful work" is a key phrase in the contest; so-called "toy" quantum computers, using only a few electrons, are already proven to exist, so the challenge is more about larger, scalable quantum computers. Here's Aaronson addressing the problem of disproving a theory, and responding to the accusation that his challenge is the equivalent of proving Bigfoot doesn't exist:

Whether Bigfoot exists is a question about the contingent history of evolution on Earth. By contrast, whether scalable quantum computing is possible is a question about the laws of physics. It's perfectly conceivable that future developments in physics would conflict with scalable quantum computing, in the same way that relativity conflicts with faster-than-light communication, and the Second Law of Thermodynamics conflicts with perpetuum mobiles. It's for such a development in physics that I'm offering this prize.


It's pretty unlikely it'll ever happen; like Aaronson notes, if anybody actually managed to prove this, the world would hear about it and his $100,000 would end up supplementing some Nobel money or something. Still though, we like the gumption of offering cash money to your harshest critics.

[Scott Aaronson via SlashDot]

RELATED
MIT's Wearable Sensor Pack Turns First Responders Into Digital Mapmakers
Robots have seemingly unlimited potential when it comes to search and rescue operations - they can enter hazardous environments, quickly map dangerous areas for first responders, a... more >
 
2 COMMENTS
lordba
04 March, 2012, 03:32 PM
what a wonderful goal. why dont we find that out by testing it first? im gonna give out 20 billion dollars to whoever proves moores law will stop in 3 years. I guess the money could bias my conclusion.
deeliciousplum
05 March, 2012, 05:25 AM
It is highly probable that it was mischief and an unnecessary amount of frustration that pressed a "scientist" to make such an offer as -- "MIT Scientist Offers $100,000 to Anyone Who Can Prove Quantum Computing Is Impossible". It takes courage and integrity to mindfully accept a warranted and meaningful amount of scrutiny, criticism and skepticism about one's notions. These aforementioned things are a handful of the many empowering and valuable components of Science.

Leave a comment

Please provide your details to leave a comment.

The fields marked with (*) are required.


Display Name: *
Email *:
Comments *:
(Max 750 characters)
Characters remaining:
*

(letters are not case-sensitive)
Captcha

Enter the text in the image above
 
Editor's Picks
BY Clay Dillow POSTED 21.05.2013 | 0 COMMENTS
BY Dan Nosowitz POSTED 14.05.2013 | 0 COMMENTS